Analyzing Cohesion Errors in Written Discourse of Iranian Arabic Learners (Case Study: Kashan University)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph. D. Student of Arabic Language and Literature, Universityof Kashan, Kashan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Universityof Kashan, Kashan, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Universityof Kashan, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Writing is usually the last skill to develop among the four language skills. This is an advanced level in which the second language learner must be able to produce a text conforming to the principles of text construction in the target language. Since coherence is one of the basic features of every text, the present study attempted to investigate errors that caused text incoherence. To be coherent and cohesive, every text should contain linguistic forms which create links among sentences. These forms include elements of grammatical coherence, lexical coherence, and conjunctions categorized by Halliday and Hassan who consider them as guarantees for the link among sentences. Using a descriptive-analytic method as well as the theoretical model, the present study attempted to analyze, classify and interpret errors in texts written by Persian-speaking learners’ of Arabic. Considering the purposes of the study and the accessibility of the participants, the targeted population included all the forth-year female undergraduate learners studying Arabic at the University of Kashan in 2017 and 2018. Writing samples were collected from all members and the sample was, therefore, equal in size to the population. The instruments included the error identification checklist and the sample compositions on three descriptive tasks. The results of the analysis, following Halliday’s and Hassan’ categories, indicated that failure to use coherence-related linguistic forms and their incorrect application can lead to text weakness and incoherence. It was also found that an important indicator of writing quality for Arabic learners is their mastery of these linguistic elements. This is to say that learners who used the elements more frequently, produced texts of a better quality.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References in Arabic
-   Estestieh, Sh. (2004). Competencies and problems in second language acquisition (Ektesab al-Loqhah al-Saniah al Kefayat val-Moshkelat). Jouzoor Journal, 8, 133-176.
-   Brown, D. (1994), Principles of language learning and teaching (Abdo Al-Rajhi & Ali Ali Ahmad Shaaban, Trans.) Beirut: Dar Al-Nehdah al-Arabiya.
-   Papi, A. Khaqani Isfahani, M. (2018). An analysis of the errors of subject-predicate agreement made by Arabic language students at the universities of Tehran. Studies in Arabic Teaching and Learning, 2(4), 57-78.
-   Al-Tawabiyya, M. A. (2015). Written discourse problems by Learners of Arabic. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Petra University Arabic Language department.
-   Taftazani, S. (2009). Mokhtasar al Ma'ani (9th Ed), Qom: Dar al-Fikr.
-   Jalaie, M. (2008). A study of the written errors of undergraduate Learners of Arabic in Kashan University and Isfahan University. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Isfahan, University of Isfahan, Department of Arabic Language and Literature
-   Khatabi, M. (1991). Text linguistics: An introduction to cohesion (Lesaniyat al-Nass). Beirut: Arabic Cultural Center.
-   Al-Khafaji, R. (2014). Towards Modern Linguistic Studies for Arabic Speech: The Study of Lexical Cohesion as an Example. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 48(2), 764-866.
-   Khalil, I. M. (2011). A collection of papers on contemporary linguistics and criticism. Oman: Dar Majdlawi Publishing.
-   Khalil, I. M. (2009). Linguistics and text syntax (fi al-lesaniat va nahv al-nass, 2nd ed.). Oman Dar- al-Maysareh Publishing.
-   Al-Zonnad, A. (1993). Text structure (Nasij al-Nass), Beirut: Arab Cultural Center.
-   Ta'ima Roshdy, A. (2004). Linguistic skills and levels of teaching difficulties (Al-Maharat al-Loghaviah…). Cairo. Dar al-Fikr Al-Arabi.
-   Abaabna, Y. & Amna Saleh, A. (2013). Elements of Textual Coherence and Cohesion, An Analytical Text Reading in a Song for the Month of Ayyer by Ahmed Abd Al-Muti Al-Hejazi. Damascus University Journal, 29(1), 501-550.
-   Abdulrahman, H. (2016). A Text Linguistics Study of Aqqad's papers. Alexandria: International Horus Foundation.
-   Akkasheh, O. Y. (2003). The hidden Grammar: An invitation for a new reading of Arabic syntax (al-Nahv al-Ghayeb…). Beirut: Al-Arabbiyah Institute.
-   Al-Annati, V. (2010). Discourse analysis for teaching non-native speakers (Tahili al-Khatab va Ta'lim Mofradat). Al-Basa'er Journal, 13(2), 91-126.
-   Al-Annati, V. (2012). Discourse analysis for teaching Foreign languages (Tahili al-Khatab va Ta'lim al-loghat al-ajnabiyyah). Jordan Journal of Arabic Language, 13(3), 90-126.
-   Al-Annati, V. (2010). Discourse analysis for teaching writing to non-native speakers of Arabic (Tahili al-Khatab va Ta'lim al-ensha). Umm al-qora University Journal of linguistics, 9, 115-156.
-   Fadhel, A. (2015). Semantic Cohesion in 'al-Asha' al-Akhir'. Journal of Kufa Research Center.  36, 117-142).
-   Fadl, S. (1996). Discourse eloquence and text linguistics. Cairo: The Egyptian International Publishing Longman.
-   Fairclaugh, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research (Talal Vahbeh, Trans). Beirut: The Arab Organization for Translation.
-   Wolfgang, H. & Dieter F. (2009). Introduction to Textual Linguistics (Faleh Bin Shbayh Al Ajmi Trans.) Riyadh: King Saud University Press.
-   Maliz, S. (2004). Discourse (Yusef Bagul, Trans). Translation Laboratory in Literature, Montauri University.
-   Naous, Ben Yahia, T. (2014); Analysis of the Qur'anic Discourse in the Light of the Text linguistics: An Applied Study of Surah Al-Baqarah. Cairo: Arabic Ghods Publishing.
-   Al-Hashemi, A. & Mahmood A. (2012). Arabic Language Learning Strategies of Arabic Language Learners at the University of Islamic Sciences in Malaysia and their Beliefs. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2), 105-117.
 
References in Persian
-   Alavi Salwa M. (2016). Contextual Relationships in the Quran: Relationship of Cohesion and Structure (Jalili. Seyyed Akbar, Translator). Tehran: Nevise parsi Publishing.
-   Babaei, R. (2015). Write better; writing, simple writing, cutie writing; 3rd ed, Qom: Adyan publication.
-   Hossein-Phnahi Tazeabad, M. & Varzandeh, O. (2012). Comparative Study of Writing Errors of Iranian Students in English and Arabic Languages, Persian Language and Literature Quarterly, 9(3), 64-43.
-   Rostambeik, A. et. al. (2017). A Study and analysis of the development of lexical cohesion in the written discourse of Farsi language students. Language Related Research, 36, 179-205.
-   Shokiba, A. & Asadzadeh, H. (2013). The Effect of Text Coherence on the Micro and Macro Levels on Improving the Quality of Understanding, Research and Writing of Academic Books, 17(30), 50-66.
-   Azizi, N. & Kahzadi, M. (2014). Analysis of writing errors of Bilingual Students in Fifth grade students in Sanandaj, Teaching Research Journal, 2, 32-19.
-   Mohammadi, A. (2017). Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Ravesh-shenasan Publishing.
-   Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (Mohsen Nobakht, Trans.) Tehran: Sinjarood Publications.
 
 
 
 English Reference
-   Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1-16.