Attitudes of the Teachers of Arabic Language to Non-native Learners at the Level of Bachelor Degree in Iranian Universities towards the Communicative Approach

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Imam Sadiq University (Female Campus), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
     Methods of teaching are emphasized at all stages of the Arabic language teaching process. Most non-Arabic language learners suffer from poor language skills and are unable to express their thoughts and feelings fluently in this language. That is why changes in teaching methods, to better teach the language in a way that the learner is eager to learn, is a must. When we look at the current state of Arabic language teaching, we find that the most important challenge facing Arabic language teaching in Iran and other countries that teach this language to non-Arabic speakers is the unfamiliarity of Arabic language teachers with the four language skills with the latest teaching methods.
      The present study aimed to find out how Arabic language teachers in the undergraduate course of Iranian universities treat non-native students with an attitude towards communication. To do this, the researcher used the Karavas-Doukas method to examine perspectives on the communicative approach. It was made up of 22 paragraphs and five sections. This method was based on group work, the importance of grammar rules, error correction, teacher role, and evaluation.
    The statistical sample of the research was some students in the Department of Arabic Language and Literature in Iranian universities. The research instrument of the study was a questionnaire and an interview. The study was a field study, with the questionnaire distributed among 447 students and 35 professors. The research question of the study was: from the point of view of professors and students, what do the teachers who teach Arabic to non-native speakers say about the communicative approach in teaching Arabic to non-native speakers? The results showed that students’ views on this issue were different from those of professors. Many teachers claimed to use communication methods, but in practice, they often followed old teaching methods. This is due to the teachers’ subconscious belief that it is necessary to control the educational situation. Also due to the specific time allotted for lectures, a large number of students, the lack of teaching aids, and other reasons, teachers tended to focus more on teaching. The authors of the present study also analyzed the most important reasons that have led to the marginalization of many effective and valuable curricula, including teachers’ lack of commitment to speaking Arabic and the use of Persian in the classroom, lack of practical examples, the teacher being unable to speak fluent Arabic, and students refusing to do assignments.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Arabic and Persian References
Books
-         Brown, D. (1994). Principles of Language Teaching and Learning. Translated by Abdo Al-Rajhi and Ali Ahmad Shaban. Beirut: Arab Renaissance House for Printing and Publishing.
-         Al-Shehri, M. A. (2011). Methods of Teaching Arabic Language Materials. Al-Madinah International University.
-         Chastain, K. (2011). Developing Second-Language Skills. Translated by Mahmood NoormohamadiTehran: Zabankade Publication.
-         Richards, J., & Rogers, Th. (1990). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Translated by Abdul Rahman Al-Aziz Al-Abdan, Omar Al-Sadiq Abdullah, Ismaiel Al-Seini. Riyadh: Dar Alam Al-Kotob publication
-         Germain, C. (2009). Le Point Sur L'approche Communicative. Translated by Rahmatian, Rooholah. Tehran: Samt Publication.
-         Toemah, A., Madkour, A., & Haridi, I. (2010). Reference in the Curricula of Teaching Arabic to Speakers of Other Languages. Cairo: Dar Al-fikr Al-Arabi Publications.
-         Auda, A. E. (2012). The Importance of Communication in the Process of Teaching the English Language, What the Teacher Needs of Modern Methods in Teaching the Communicative Method. Baghdad: Dhi Qar University.
-         Al-Fawzan, A. R. I. (2009). Be a Lighting Specialist to Increase the Efficiency of Arabic Teachers for Non-Native Speakers. (n.p): Arabic for everyone.
-         Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Translated by Mansour Fahim and Mastane Haqani. Tehran: Gohar Andishe Publication.
-         Mohseninejad, S. (2018). Methods of Teaching the Second Language, the Communicative Approach in Teaching the Arabic Language (1st Edition). Tehran: Imam Al-Sadiq University (AS).
-         Naqi, M. K. (1985). Teaching Arabic for Speakers of Other Languages. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Umm Al-Qura University, Institute of Arabic Language.
 
Articles
-         Jalali, M., Ganji, N., & Aslani, S. (2012). A Study of the Effectiveness of Teaching Contemporary Arabic Literature Continuously on the Skill of Speech of Iranian Students, Isfahan University, as a Model. Journal of Researches in the Arabic Language and Literature, 8, 27-41.
-         Khawaldeh, M. A., Nasr, M., Muhammad Fawzi, B. Y., & Raed, M. Kh. (2011). Attitudes of Arabic Language Teachers for Non-Native Speakers in Jordanian Universities towards the Communicative Approach. Journal of Ismailia College of Education (Al-Balqa Applied University), 21, 157-186.
-         Rasooli, H. (2005). Sources of the Defect in the Teaching of the Arabic Language in Iranian Universities. Journal of Humanities Research, 48-47, 44-57.
 
Persian Thesis
-         Jalali, M. (2012). Studying the Communicative Approach in the Teaching of Contemporary Arabic Literature to Iranian Arabic Students. MA Thesis, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Isfahan University.
-         Hussein, M. A. (2002). Teaching the Arabic Language in Light of Modern Curricula. PhD Thesis, Department of Curricula, College of Education, African University.
-         Al-Faqih, Kh. O. (2009). The Level of Application of the Procedures for Teaching English Speaking Skill According to the Communicative Approach. Master thesis, Kassadi Merbah University Jordan.
-         Mohseny Nejad, S. (2015). The Skill of Arabic Conversation at the Bachelor's Level in Iran during the Years 1360-1390. (Studying and Providing an Equivalent Model Based on the Continuous Education Curriculum). PhD Thesis, College of Arts and Humanities, Al-Khwarizmi University.
 
Latin References
-         Brown, H. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson. Education, Inc. 
-         Karavas-Doukas, E. (1996). Using Attitude Scales to Investigate TeachersAttitudes to the Communicative Approach. ELT Journal, 50(3), 187-98 
-         Mangubhai, F., Dashwood, A., Berthold, M., Flores, M., & Dale, J. (1998). Primary LOTE Teachers, Understandings, and Beliefs about Communicative Language. Retrieved February 1, 2010, from Centre for Research into Language Teaching Methodologies: web site: http://eprints. us4. edu. au/8901 teaching: Report on the first phase of the project. 
Pan. Y. (2008). Faculty MembersAttitudes, and Concerns about Communicative Language Implementation in General English Courses in Taiwan Universities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota.