Students’ Attitudes at Shiraz University toward Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Their Patterns: A Descriptive Survey Study

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 MA Student of Arabic Language and Literature, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Extended Abstract
The use of vocabulary learning strategies contributes significantly to facilitating vocabulary acquisition and makes learners more successful in using the language compared with their peers who do not resort to such strategies. In light of the importance of vocabulary learning strategies in developing the four language skills, this study adopts a descriptive-survey methodology to examine the attitudes of Arabic language students at Shiraz University toward vocabulary learning strategies, namely cognitive, metacognitive, social, memory, and decision-making strategies. The study also seeks to answer the following two research questions:
 

Which strategies exhibit the highest frequency of use, and which show the lowest?
What are the underlying reasons for learners’ preference for certain strategies and their avoidance of others?

 
To collect the data, Schmidt’s (1997) Vocabulary Learning Strategies Questionnaire was employed. This questionnaire is used to investigate the types of vocabulary learning strategies adopted by learners, with the aim of identifying their frequency and patterns among the participants. It is regarded by a large number of researchers as the most comprehensive and integrative instrument in the field of vocabulary learning strategies (Gelik & Toptaş, 2010).
 
The questionnaire comprised five categories of learning strategies, each containing eight items, resulting in a total of forty items. These five categories, respectively, are: memory strategies, determination strategies, social strategies, cognitive strategies, and finally, metacognitive strategies. The questionnaire was designed using a five-point Likert scale (very high, high, moderate, low, and very low).
 
The statistical population of the present study consisted of students of the Department of Arabic Language and Literature at Iranian universities, while the statistical sample was limited to 100 undergraduate and Master’s students majoring in Arabic Language and Literature at Shiraz University. Since the participants were drawn from this major at Shiraz University, convenience sampling was adopted to select the respondents. Within the framework of this study, after providing students with information about the questionnaire and its objectives, they were asked to complete it. Accordingly, 65 undergraduate students and 35 Master’s students from Shiraz University responded to the questionnaire’s items.
 
The findings of the study show that determination strategies are the most popular among undergraduate and Master’s students in the Department of Arabic Language and Literature at Shiraz University. These are followed by metacognitive strategies as the second most frequently used, and memory strategies, cognitive strategies, and finally, social strategies, respectively. Students’ preference for determination strategies can be explained by their practicality and ease of implementation, as well as their reduced reliance on specialized knowledge, making them accessible to learners at all proficiency levels.
 
Among social strategies, searching for information online recorded a very high frequency and emerged as the most prominent strategy. This preference may be attributed to the ease of access to electronic resources, their extensive availability, the diversity of content, and the possibility of easily comparing meanings and different perspectives. In contrast, the strategies of group language games and collaborative training to expand vocabulary knowledge showed low frequencies within the social strategy category. The limited preference for group language games may be explained by factors such as the informal nature of the activity, the scarcity of instructional resources designed for this approach, and individual differences among students. Similarly, the low use of collaborative training strategies may be related to a lack of group harmony, time constraints, or fear of peer evaluation.
 
Overall, students in the Department of Arabic Language and Literature at Shiraz University tend to favor individual strategies and show less interest in group activities. With the advancement of technology and the increased use of smartphones and digital encyclopedias, students may have less motivation to engage in collaborative activities and face-to-face interaction in the learning process. Schmidt (1997, p. 33) emphasizes the effectiveness of learning through social interaction, particularly in authentic language environments. Nevertheless, neglecting this strategy—whether due to learners’ insufficient awareness of its impact on language learning or their shyness in communicating with others—deprives them of its potential benefits.
 
With regard to cognitive strategies, it was observed that the oral repetition of words, note-taking, reviewing previous lessons, using a notebook to record vocabulary, and establishing links between words and physical objects were among the most frequently used strategies. In contrast, listening to Arabic-language CDs and using flashcards were among the least frequently strategies employed by students. In general, students’ inclination toward the more frequently used strategies can be attributed to their practicality, accessibility, and flexibility. The limited use of other strategies may be due to their lower appeal and the time-consuming nature of their implementation, which reduces students’ willingness to adopt them. Additional reasons for the limited use of CDs may include difficulties in access, limited active learner engagement, and poor retention resulting from their non-interactive nature. As for the infrequent use of flashcards, in addition to the aforementioned reasons, other factors may include the time required to create them, the tendency toward superficial vocabulary learning, and limited active engagement.
 
Regarding metacognitive strategies, strategies involving direct engagement with linguistic content—such as watching films, studying advertisements, and linking words to one another—were found to be the most frequently used strategies among learners, whereas listening to podcasts was among the least used strategies. The extensive use of these strategies can be explained by their practicality and flexibility, while students’ reluctance to listen to podcasts may be attributed to challenges related to content comprehension. As for memory strategies, strategies involving associating words with images and repeated rehearsal were among the most frequently used, whereas reviewing the preceding and following words of a new vocabulary item was the least used. Finally, with respect to determination strategies, guessing meanings and using dictionaries were among the most frequently employed strategies by students.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 Akbari, F., & Rimani Nikou, F., & Ahmadi-Azad, Sh. (2023). Unveiling vocabulary learning strategies: A mixed methods study among EAP students. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 16(32), 119-144.
Ali, M. M. Y. (2007). Meaning and Shades of Meaning: Semantic Systems in Arabic (2nd ed.). Beirut: Dar Al-Manar Al-Islami. [In Arabic]
Al-Khawaldeh, M. A. F. (2015). Arabic language learning strategies among Malaysian students at Yarmouk University and their relationship to major and gender variables. The Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(2), 169-186.
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Birzahad, H. (2017). Vocabulary Learning Strategies among Undergraduate Students of Arabic Language and Literature: Isfahan University Students as a Case Study. Isfahan: Isfahan University Press. [In Arabic]
Celik, S., & Toptaş, V. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 62-71.
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.
Farrokh, P. (2021). A comparison of the use of English vocabulary learning strategies among students with stuttering and typical students. Disability Studies, 11, 1-7.
Gu, Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language, person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7, 1-25.
Hashemi, Z., & Hadvai, M. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies of medical students: A case study of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 629-637.
Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khoury, G. (2008). Vocabulary acquisition in Arabic as a foreign language: The root and pattern strategy [Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University].
Kim, E. (2008). Beliefs and experiences of Korean pre service and in-service English teachers about English vocabulary acquisition strategies [Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, New York University].
Lai, Y. L. (2005). Teaching vocabulary learning strategies: Awareness and practice [Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Essex].
Malik, A. R., & Asnur, M. N. A. (2019). Using social media as a learning media of foreign language students in higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 18, 75-166.
McCarthy, D. (2007). Review of the book word sense disambiguation: Algorithms and applications. Computational Linguistics, 33, 255-258.
Mohammadi, D., & & Abbasi, S. (2024). Gradation in Presenting concrete and abstract vocabulary and methods of their presentation in Arabic Language teaching series for non-native speakers. Journal of Studies in Teaching and Learning Arabic, 8(2), 1-20. [In Arabic].
Mohammadi, M. (2009). The relationship between the use of learning strategies and proficiency level among learners of English as a Foreign Language. Journal of Innovations in Educational Management, 4(3), 103-116.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2008). Lexical awareness in second language learning. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. pp. 167-177.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. Tesl Canada Journal, 7(2), 9-30.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paul, P. V. (2013). The digital generation: the good, the bad, and the ugly. American Annals of the Deaf, 157, 407-411.
Pavicic, T. V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmitt, N. (2007). Current perspectives on vocabulary teaching and learning. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching. pp. 827-841.
Susanti, N. (2022). The effectiveness of using visual media in enhancing Arabic vocabulary retention among students at state elementary school 1 Rejang Lebong [BA Thesis, Gorontalo State Islamic University, Malaysia].
Vahedi V. S. (2021). The effectiveness of hypertext annotations on learners' vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Teaching Education, 15, 339-349.
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of synonymy on second-language vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19, 120-136.
Waldvogel, D. A. (2013). The relationships between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size among adult Spanish foreign language learners. Language Teaching and Research, 4, 209-219.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold LTD.
Wesche, M. B., & Paribakht, T. S. (2010). Lexical inferencing in a first and second language: Cross-linguistic dimensions. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Zamani, A. (2019). A Study of the Effect of Educational Films Compared to Non-Educational Films on Learning Arabic Vocabulary. Isfahan: Isfahan University Press. [In Arabic]
Zhi-liang, L. (2010). A study on English vocabulary learning strategies for non-English majors in independent college. Cross-cultural Communication, 6, 152-164.